Suppress vault callbacks when loading or unloading VNodeMgrs.

On MOULa, there have been complaints about linking to some Neighborhoods
and activating some players taking a very long time. One of these
Neighborhoods in particular is the "DRC(67) Bevin". When I attempted to
link to this Age, I found the link took approximately 85 seconds each
time. On profiling, I discovered that for every node downloaded during
the initialization phase, we were calling into Python at least once.
Suppressing vault callbacks during times when they are obviously going
to storm and be useless decreases the link time to 7 seconds.

Sources/Plasma/PubUtilLib/plVault/plVaultClientApi.cpp

@@ -181,7 +181,28 @@ struct VaultDownloadTrans {
 	unsigned	vaultId;
 	ENetError	result;
 	
-	VaultDownloadTrans ();
+	VaultDownloadTrans()
+		: callback(), cbParam(), progressCallback(), cbProgressParam(),
+		nodeCount(), nodesLeft(), vaultId(), result(kNetSuccess)
+	{
+		VaultSuppressCallbacks();
+	}
+
+	VaultDownloadTrans(const wchar_t* _tag, FVaultDownloadCallback _callback,
+		void* _cbParam, FVaultProgressCallback _progressCallback,
+		void* _cbProgressParam, unsigned _vaultId)
+		: callback(_callback), cbParam(_cbParam), progressCallback(_progressCallback),
+		  cbProgressParam(_cbProgressParam), nodeCount(), nodesLeft(),
+		  vaultId(_vaultId), result(kNetSuccess)
+	{
+		StrCopy(tag, _tag, MAX_PATH);
+		VaultSuppressCallbacks();
+	}
+
+	~VaultDownloadTrans()
+	{
+		VaultEnableCallbacks();
+	}
 	
 	static void VaultNodeFetched (
 		ENetError			result,
@@ -262,6 +283,8 @@ static HASHTABLEDECL(
 
 static bool s_processPlayerInbox = false;
 
+static long s_suppressCallbacks = 0;
+
 /*****************************************************************************
 *
 *   Local functions
@@ -303,8 +326,10 @@ static void VaultNodeAddedDownloadCallback(ENetError result, void * param) {
 						VaultProcessUnvisitNote(childLink->node);
 				}
 
-				for (IVaultCallback * cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
+				if (s_suppressCallbacks == 0) {
-					cb->cb->AddedChildNode(parentLink->node, childLink->node);
+					for (IVaultCallback* cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
+						cb->cb->AddedChildNode(parentLink->node, childLink->node);
+				}
 			}
 		}
 
@@ -377,9 +402,11 @@ static void BuildNodeTree (
 			parentNode->state->children.Add(childLink);
 
 			if (notifyNow || childNode->nodeType != 0) {
-				// We made a new link, so make the callbacks
+				if (s_suppressCallbacks == 0) {
-				for (IVaultCallback * cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
+					// We made a new link, so make the callbacks
-					cb->cb->AddedChildNode(parentNode, childNode);
+					for (IVaultCallback* cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
+						cb->cb->AddedChildNode(parentNode, childNode);
+				}
 			}
 			else {
 				INotifyAfterDownload* notify = NEWZERO(INotifyAfterDownload)(parentNode->nodeId, childNode->nodeId);
@@ -543,6 +570,10 @@ static void ChangedVaultNodeFetched (
 
 	RelVaultNodeLink* savedLink = s_nodes.Find(node->nodeId);
 
+	// Yeah, we are purposefully allowing this global callback to go out,
+	// even if callback suppression has been enabled. The intent behind
+	// that is to suppress spurious callbacks, but node changes are
+	// probably not spurious.
 	if (savedLink) {
 		for (IVaultCallback * cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
 			cb->cb->ChangedNode(savedLink->node);
@@ -638,7 +669,7 @@ static void VaultNodeAdded (
 	RelVaultNodeLink* parentLink	= s_nodes.Find(parentId);
 	RelVaultNodeLink* childLink		= s_nodes.Find(childId);
 
-	if (childLink->node->nodeType != 0) {
+	if (childLink->node->nodeType != 0 && s_suppressCallbacks == 0) {
 		for (IVaultCallback * cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
 			cb->cb->AddedChildNode(parentLink->node, childLink->node);
 	}
@@ -660,7 +691,7 @@ static void VaultNodeRemoved (
 		if (!childLink)
 			break;
 			
-		if (parentLink->node->IsParentOf(childId, 1)) {
+		if (parentLink->node->IsParentOf(childId, 1) && s_suppressCallbacks == 0) {
 			// We have the relationship, so make the callbacks
 			for (IVaultCallback * cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
 				cb->cb->RemovingChildNode(parentLink->node, childLink->node);
@@ -831,11 +862,6 @@ void VaultFindNodeTrans::VaultNodeFound (
 *
 ***/
 
-//============================================================================
-VaultDownloadTrans::VaultDownloadTrans () {
-	ASSERT(!nodeCount);	// must be alloced with
-}
-
 //============================================================================
 void VaultDownloadTrans::VaultNodeFetched (
 	ENetError			result,
@@ -1047,8 +1073,10 @@ void IRelVaultNode::UnlinkFromRelatives () {
 		next = parents.Next(link);
 
 		// We have the relationship, so make the callbacks
-		for (IVaultCallback * cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
+		if (s_suppressCallbacks == 0) {
-			cb->cb->RemovingChildNode(link->node, this->node);
+			for (IVaultCallback* cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
+				cb->cb->RemovingChildNode(link->node, this->node);
+		}
 
 		link->node->state->Unlink(node);
 	}
@@ -1478,6 +1506,16 @@ void VaultUnregisterCallback (VaultCallback * cb) {
 	cb->internal = nil;
 }
 
+//============================================================================
+void VaultSuppressCallbacks() {
+	AtomicAdd(&s_suppressCallbacks, 1);
+}
+
+//============================================================================
+void VaultEnableCallbacks() {
+	long prevValue = AtomicAdd(&s_suppressCallbacks, -1);
+    hsAssert(prevValue > 0, "Hmm... A negative vault callback suppression count?");
+}
 
 /*****************************************************************************
 *
@@ -1772,8 +1810,10 @@ void VaultRemoveChildNode (
 			
 		if (parentLink->node->IsParentOf(childId, 1)) {
 			// We have the relationship, so make the callbacks
-			for (IVaultCallback * cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
+			if (s_suppressCallbacks == 0) {
-				cb->cb->RemovingChildNode(parentLink->node, childLink->node);
+				for (IVaultCallback* cb = s_callbacks.Head(); cb; cb = s_callbacks.Next(cb))
+					cb->cb->RemovingChildNode(parentLink->node, childLink->node);
+			}
 		}
 			
 		parentLink->node->state->Unlink(childLink->node);
@@ -4945,13 +4985,8 @@ void VaultDownload (
 	FVaultProgressCallback		progressCallback,
 	void *						cbProgressParam
 ) {
-	VaultDownloadTrans * trans = NEWZERO(VaultDownloadTrans);
+	VaultDownloadTrans * trans = new VaultDownloadTrans(tag, callback, cbParam,
-	StrCopy(trans->tag, tag, arrsize(trans->tag));
+		progressCallback, cbProgressParam, vaultId);
-	trans->callback			= callback;
-	trans->cbParam			= cbParam;
-	trans->progressCallback	= progressCallback;
-	trans->cbProgressParam	= cbProgressParam;
-	trans->vaultId			= vaultId;
 
 	NetCliAuthVaultFetchNodeRefs(
 		vaultId,
@@ -5001,6 +5036,8 @@ void VaultDownloadAndWait (
 
 //============================================================================
 void VaultCull (unsigned vaultId) {
+	VaultCallbackSuppressor suppress;
+
 	// Remove the node from the global table
 	if (RelVaultNodeLink * link = s_nodes.Find(vaultId)) {
 		LogMsg(kLogDebug, L"Vault: Culling node %u", link->node->nodeId);

Sources/Plasma/PubUtilLib/plVault/plVaultClientApi.h

@@ -82,6 +82,18 @@ struct VaultCallback {
 void VaultRegisterCallback (VaultCallback * cb);
 void VaultUnregisterCallback (VaultCallback * cb);
 
+void VaultSuppressCallbacks();
+void VaultEnableCallbacks();
+
+class VaultCallbackSuppressor
+{
+	VaultCallbackSuppressor(const VaultCallbackSuppressor&) { }
+	VaultCallbackSuppressor(VaultCallbackSuppressor&&) { }
+
+public:
+	VaultCallbackSuppressor() { VaultSuppressCallbacks(); }
+	~VaultCallbackSuppressor() { VaultEnableCallbacks(); }
+};
 
 /*****************************************************************************
 *