You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
1034 lines
32 KiB
1034 lines
32 KiB
// Copyright 2005, Google Inc. |
|
// All rights reserved. |
|
// |
|
// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without |
|
// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are |
|
// met: |
|
// |
|
// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright |
|
// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. |
|
// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above |
|
// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer |
|
// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the |
|
// distribution. |
|
// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its |
|
// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from |
|
// this software without specific prior written permission. |
|
// |
|
// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS |
|
// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
|
// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR |
|
// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT |
|
// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, |
|
// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
|
// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, |
|
// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY |
|
// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT |
|
// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE |
|
// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
|
// |
|
// The purpose of this file is to generate Google Test output under |
|
// various conditions. The output will then be verified by |
|
// gtest_output_test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the |
|
// desired messages. Therefore, most tests in this file are MEANT TO |
|
// FAIL. |
|
// |
|
// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) |
|
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" |
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h" |
|
|
|
// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's |
|
// implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is |
|
// included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to |
|
// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in |
|
// his code. |
|
#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 |
|
#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" |
|
#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ |
|
|
|
#include <stdlib.h> |
|
|
|
#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
|
using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter; |
|
using testing::TestPartResultArray; |
|
|
|
using testing::internal::Notification; |
|
using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam; |
|
#endif |
|
|
|
namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix; |
|
using testing::internal::scoped_ptr; |
|
|
|
// Tests catching fatal failures. |
|
|
|
// A subroutine used by the following test. |
|
void TestEq1(int x) { |
|
ASSERT_EQ(1, x); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it |
|
// generates, and then returns early. |
|
void TryTestSubroutine() { |
|
// Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. |
|
TestEq1(2); |
|
|
|
// Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. |
|
// |
|
// The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling |
|
// HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture. |
|
if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return; |
|
|
|
// If we get here, something is wrong. |
|
FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) { |
|
} |
|
|
|
TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) { |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the |
|
// failing test summary. |
|
class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {}; |
|
|
|
TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) { |
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam()); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print |
|
// its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests. |
|
INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams, |
|
FailingParamTest, |
|
testing::Values(2)); |
|
|
|
static const char kGoldenString[] = "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2"; |
|
|
|
TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, EscapesStringOperands) { |
|
std::string actual = "actual \"string\""; |
|
EXPECT_EQ(kGoldenString, actual); |
|
|
|
const char* golden = kGoldenString; |
|
EXPECT_EQ(golden, actual); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine. |
|
TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); |
|
|
|
TryTestSubroutine(); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine. |
|
TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); |
|
|
|
// Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. |
|
TryTestSubroutine(); |
|
|
|
// Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. |
|
// |
|
// When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test |
|
// fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed. |
|
if (HasFatalFailure()) return; |
|
|
|
// If we get here, something is wrong. |
|
FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check. |
|
TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure |
|
ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed. |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions. |
|
TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) { |
|
static const int a[4] = { |
|
3, 9, 2, 6 |
|
}; |
|
|
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n"); |
|
for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) { |
|
printf("i == %d\n", i); |
|
EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]); |
|
} |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro. |
|
|
|
// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. |
|
void SubWithoutTrace(int n) { |
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, n); |
|
ASSERT_EQ(2, n); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. |
|
void SubWithTrace(int n) { |
|
SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n); |
|
|
|
SubWithoutTrace(n); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes. |
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) { |
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
|
|
|
// There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked. |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; |
|
|
|
{ |
|
SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace"); |
|
// After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain |
|
// the trace. |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there |
|
// should be no trace again. |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop. |
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) { |
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
|
|
|
for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) { |
|
SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i); |
|
|
|
SubWithoutTrace(i); |
|
} |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine. |
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) { |
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
|
|
|
SubWithTrace(1); |
|
SubWithTrace(2); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested. |
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) { |
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
|
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message. |
|
|
|
SubWithTrace(2); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope. |
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) { |
|
printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
|
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("A"); |
|
ADD_FAILURE() |
|
<< "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A."; |
|
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("B"); |
|
ADD_FAILURE() |
|
<< "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B."; |
|
|
|
{ |
|
SCOPED_TRACE("C"); |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should " |
|
<< "contain trace point A, B, and C."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
SCOPED_TRACE("D"); |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should " |
|
<< "contain trace point A, B, and D."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
|
// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple |
|
// threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by |
|
// SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only. |
|
|
|
// Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test: |
|
// |
|
// Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned) |
|
// ===============================|================================ |
|
// spawns thread B | |
|
// -------------------------------+-------------------------------- |
|
// waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); |
|
// | generates failure #1 |
|
// | notifies n1 |
|
// -------------------------------+-------------------------------- |
|
// SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2 |
|
// generates failure #2 | |
|
// notifies n2 | |
|
// -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
|
// waits for n3 | generates failure #3 |
|
// | trace B dies |
|
// | generates failure #4 |
|
// | notifies n3 |
|
// -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
|
// generates failure #5 | finishes |
|
// trace A dies | |
|
// generates failure #6 | |
|
// -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
|
// waits for thread B to finish | |
|
|
|
struct CheckPoints { |
|
Notification n1; |
|
Notification n2; |
|
Notification n3; |
|
}; |
|
|
|
static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) { |
|
{ |
|
SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); |
|
ADD_FAILURE() |
|
<< "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive)."; |
|
check_points->n1.Notify(); |
|
check_points->n2.WaitForNotification(); |
|
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() |
|
<< "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive)."; |
|
} // Trace B dies here. |
|
ADD_FAILURE() |
|
<< "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive)."; |
|
check_points->n3.Notify(); |
|
} |
|
|
|
TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) { |
|
printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n"); |
|
|
|
CheckPoints check_points; |
|
ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace, |
|
&check_points, |
|
NULL); |
|
check_points.n1.WaitForNotification(); |
|
|
|
{ |
|
SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); |
|
ADD_FAILURE() |
|
<< "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive)."; |
|
check_points.n2.Notify(); |
|
check_points.n3.WaitForNotification(); |
|
|
|
ADD_FAILURE() |
|
<< "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive)."; |
|
} // Trace A dies here. |
|
ADD_FAILURE() |
|
<< "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive)."; |
|
thread.Join(); |
|
} |
|
#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
|
|
|
TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest, |
|
DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) { |
|
// This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for |
|
// verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag |
|
// suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of |
|
// the test output. |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F. |
|
// |
|
// This function creates two failures intentionally. |
|
void AdHocTest() { |
|
printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n"); |
|
EXPECT_TRUE(false); |
|
EXPECT_EQ(2, 3); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test. |
|
int RunAllTests() { |
|
AdHocTest(); |
|
return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor. |
|
class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { |
|
protected: |
|
NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
|
printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n"); |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void SetUp() { |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp()."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void TearDown() { |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown."; |
|
} |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor. |
|
class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { |
|
protected: |
|
FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
|
Init(); |
|
} |
|
|
|
~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void SetUp() { |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). " |
|
<< "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
|
<< "had a fatal failure."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void TearDown() { |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). " |
|
<< "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
|
<< "had a fatal failure."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
private: |
|
void Init() { |
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; |
|
} |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. " |
|
<< "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
|
<< "had a fatal failure."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp(). |
|
class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { |
|
protected: |
|
virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() { |
|
Deinit(); |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void SetUp() { |
|
printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n"); |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void TearDown() { |
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown()."; |
|
} |
|
private: |
|
void Deinit() { |
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
|
} |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { |
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests fatal failures in SetUp(). |
|
class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { |
|
protected: |
|
virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() { |
|
Deinit(); |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void SetUp() { |
|
printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n"); |
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void TearDown() { |
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown()."; |
|
} |
|
private: |
|
void Deinit() { |
|
FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
|
} |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { |
|
FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. " |
|
<< "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) { |
|
ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc"; |
|
} |
|
|
|
#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
|
|
|
// A unary function that may die. |
|
void DieIf(bool should_die) { |
|
GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf()."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context. |
|
|
|
// Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread. |
|
struct SpawnThreadNotifications { |
|
SpawnThreadNotifications() {} |
|
|
|
Notification spawn_thread_started; |
|
Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate; |
|
|
|
private: |
|
GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications); |
|
}; |
|
|
|
// The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the |
|
// MultipleThreads test (below). |
|
static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) { |
|
// Signals the main thread that this thread has started. |
|
notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify(); |
|
|
|
// Waits for permission to finish from the main thread. |
|
notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification(); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest |
|
// suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later |
|
// death tests, so it must run after all other death tests. |
|
class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test { |
|
protected: |
|
// Starts a thread and waits for it to begin. |
|
virtual void SetUp() { |
|
thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>( |
|
&ThreadRoutine, ¬ifications_, NULL)); |
|
notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification(); |
|
} |
|
// Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it. |
|
// Depending on the version of the thread library in use, |
|
// a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere |
|
// with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class |
|
// cleans up after itself as best it can. |
|
virtual void TearDown() { |
|
notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify(); |
|
} |
|
|
|
private: |
|
SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_; |
|
scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > thread_; |
|
}; |
|
|
|
#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
|
|
|
// The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a |
|
// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in |
|
// the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture |
|
// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces. |
|
|
|
// The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that |
|
// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND |
|
// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will |
|
// fail. |
|
|
|
namespace foo { |
|
|
|
class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} |
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} |
|
|
|
class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, |
|
TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} |
|
|
|
} // namespace foo |
|
|
|
namespace bar { |
|
|
|
class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
// The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the |
|
// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message. |
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {} |
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {} |
|
|
|
class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
|
// generates the right error message. |
|
TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, |
|
TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} |
|
|
|
} // namespace bar |
|
|
|
// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user |
|
// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first |
|
// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and |
|
// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F. |
|
|
|
class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {} |
|
|
|
// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
|
// generates the right error message. |
|
TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {} |
|
|
|
class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {} |
|
|
|
// Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
|
// generates the right error message. |
|
TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) { |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(). |
|
int global_integer = 0; |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. |
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { |
|
global_integer = 0; |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
|
}, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables |
|
// (static or not). |
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) { |
|
int m = 0; |
|
static int n; |
|
n = 1; |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
|
}, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly |
|
// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure. |
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
|
}, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no |
|
// non-fatal failure. |
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
}, ""); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two |
|
// non-fatal failures. |
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1."; |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2."; |
|
}, ""); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal |
|
// failure. |
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
|
}, ""); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
|
// tested returns. |
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
return; |
|
}, ""); |
|
} |
|
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
|
// tested throws. |
|
TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
try { |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
throw 0; |
|
}, ""); |
|
} catch(int) { // NOLINT |
|
} |
|
} |
|
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. |
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { |
|
global_integer = 0; |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure."; |
|
}, "Expected fatal failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static |
|
// variables. |
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) { |
|
static int n; |
|
n = 1; |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure."; |
|
}, "Expected fatal failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly |
|
// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure. |
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
|
}, "Expected fatal failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal |
|
// failure. |
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
}, ""); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// A helper for generating a fatal failure. |
|
void FatalFailure() { |
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two |
|
// fatal failures. |
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
FatalFailure(); |
|
FatalFailure(); |
|
}, ""); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal |
|
// failure. |
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
|
}, ""); |
|
} |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
|
// tested returns. |
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
return; |
|
}, ""); |
|
} |
|
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
|
|
|
// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
|
// tested throws. |
|
TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { |
|
printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
|
try { |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
|
throw 0; |
|
}, ""); |
|
} catch(int) { // NOLINT |
|
} |
|
} |
|
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
|
|
|
// This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests. |
|
#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
|
|
|
template <typename T> |
|
class TypedTest : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>); |
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) { |
|
EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam()); |
|
} |
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) { |
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; |
|
} |
|
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
|
|
|
// This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests. |
|
#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
|
|
|
template <typename T> |
|
class TypedTestP : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP); |
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) { |
|
EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam()); |
|
} |
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) { |
|
EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; |
|
} |
|
|
|
REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure); |
|
|
|
typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes; |
|
INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes); |
|
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
|
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
|
|
|
// We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case |
|
// name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
|
|
|
TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
|
} |
|
|
|
# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
|
|
|
// We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test |
|
// case name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
|
|
|
template <typename T> |
|
class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes; |
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes); |
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
|
} |
|
|
|
# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
|
|
|
# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
|
|
|
|
|
// We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests |
|
// whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
|
|
|
template <typename T> |
|
class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test { |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest); |
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
|
} |
|
|
|
REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst); |
|
|
|
INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes); |
|
|
|
# endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
|
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
|
|
|
// Tests various failure conditions of |
|
// EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}. |
|
class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test { |
|
public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2. |
|
enum FailureMode { |
|
FATAL_FAILURE, |
|
NONFATAL_FAILURE |
|
}; |
|
static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) { |
|
if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) { |
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
|
} else { |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
|
} |
|
} |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { |
|
// Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); |
|
// Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal " |
|
"failure."); |
|
// Wrong message. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure " |
|
"expected."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { |
|
// Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
|
// Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure."); |
|
// Wrong message. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal " |
|
"failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
|
|
|
class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest { |
|
protected: |
|
static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) { |
|
ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL); |
|
thread.Join(); |
|
} |
|
}; |
|
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { |
|
// We only intercept the current thread. |
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE), |
|
"Expected fatal failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { |
|
// We only intercept the current thread. |
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
|
"Expected non-fatal failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest; |
|
|
|
// Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from |
|
// the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD. |
|
TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) { |
|
printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
|
TestPartResultArray results; |
|
{ |
|
ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter( |
|
ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD, |
|
&results); |
|
AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE); |
|
AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE); |
|
} |
|
// The two failures should not have been intercepted. |
|
EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail."; |
|
} |
|
|
|
#endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
|
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { |
|
// Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); |
|
// Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
|
"Expected non-fatal failure."); |
|
// Wrong message. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), |
|
"Some other fatal failure expected."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { |
|
// Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal " |
|
"failure."); |
|
// Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), |
|
"Expected fatal failure."); |
|
// Wrong message. |
|
printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
|
EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
|
"Some other non-fatal failure."); |
|
} |
|
|
|
|
|
// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(). |
|
|
|
class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment { |
|
public: |
|
virtual void SetUp() { |
|
printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void TearDown() { |
|
printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); |
|
FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
|
} |
|
}; |
|
|
|
class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment { |
|
public: |
|
virtual void SetUp() { |
|
printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); |
|
} |
|
|
|
virtual void TearDown() { |
|
printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); |
|
ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
|
} |
|
}; |
|
|
|
bool GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = false; |
|
|
|
// The main function. |
|
// |
|
// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some |
|
// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results |
|
// with the "golden" file. |
|
int main(int argc, char **argv) { |
|
testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; |
|
|
|
// We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail. |
|
// We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of |
|
// this program with the golden file. |
|
|
|
// It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many |
|
// global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test |
|
// for it. |
|
testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); |
|
if (argc >= 2 && |
|
(std::string(argv[1]) == |
|
"--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")) |
|
GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true; |
|
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
|
if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") { |
|
// Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child |
|
// process of an threadsafe-style death test. |
|
# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS |
|
posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout); |
|
# else |
|
posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout); |
|
# endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS |
|
return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
|
} |
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
|
|
|
if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests)) |
|
return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
|
|
|
// Registers two global test environments. |
|
// The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they |
|
// are registered, and torn down in the reverse order. |
|
testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); |
|
testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment); |
|
|
|
return RunAllTests(); |
|
}
|
|
|